So, the new Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 trailer was released and left as much impact on me as getting into a arguement about Star Wars vs Star Trek: It makes you think, but in the end no one cares: http://www.callofduty.com/mw3/videos/reveal.
In my opinion the series went downhill once it started to care more about multiplayer then the campain and hasn't really been good since Call of Duty 3, but this is a new consept for a Call of Duty game. It follows a war that never happened (Yet): World War III. Sure it looks cool but my question is: Didn't the Call of Duty series use to be about realism? See you later.
FWI, plenty of people care about both Star Trek and Star Wars! The Star Trek sequel to the 2009 film is one of the most anticipated films in my eyes, and I just can't wait for Star Wars: The Old Republic! I see your point about COD, but don't put ST & SW down.
ReplyDeleteI wasn't trying to put ST or SW down. I was just saying that arguments about ST and SW aren't really important. Not that ST and SW aren't important.
ReplyDeleteThe reason the majority of people buy CoD games is for the multiplayer. In my opinion CoD: 4 is the best (1player and multiplayer). CoD 3 was terrible, no offense but it is definitely worse than CoD 2. Also, single player hasn't ever been about realism. Look at W@W and Black Ops. Real wars, not with real people. Anyway that's just how I look at it.
ReplyDeleteCoD 3 was not terrible because it didn't focus on multiplayer. 4 was ok because the campain was really short and since at the time I did not have online I couldn't play multiplayer, so anyone that bought the game for the campain was very dissapointed.
ReplyDelete